The Kootenay Doukhobor Historical Society v. The Queen case illustrates quite well that even if a non-profit and a staff person agree that the staff person is an independent contractor, there is an independent contractor agreement, and the staff person has considerable latitude in carrying out the tasks, the staff person can be found to be an employee. It is vital that non-profits and charities properly categorize staff. Failure to consider someone an employee when they really are an employee, and failure to withhold EI, CPP and income tax amounts, can result in considerable liability for a non-profit or charity. As well, directors of the non-profit or charity can be on the hook for the outstanding amount and this is probably the most common reason that the directors of a non-profit or charity would ever have personal liability.
To understand CRA’s position you should review RC4110 Employee or Self-employed? at http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/E/pub/tg/rc4110/
Here is the full case of Kootenay Doukhobor Historical Society v. The Queen: http://decision.tcc-cci.gc.ca/en/2010/2010tcc256/2010tcc256.html
Related Posts
April 16, 2024
Canadian Federal Budget 2024 and its impact on non-profits and charities
Today, Canadian Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland introduced the Federal 2024 Budget. Here is a note with our comments on the 2024 Canadian Federal…
April 13, 2024
CRA letter on claiming Canadian charity gifts and the five year carry forward
CRA recently put out a letter dealing claiming Canadian charity gifts and the five-year carry forward. For “most” people, when they donate to…
April 12, 2024
Global “Alberta universities concerned about bill mandating provincial approval of federal funding”
In a recent article Global News notes: Incoming legislation that requires provincial approval of direct agreements with the federal government has…